Today is deepavali we are celebrating the festival of lights but there is also another past that is said to be the reason for celebrating deepavali i.e., the death of Naragasuran. When I was a kid my mom used to tell me.. even if it is your enemy, you shouldn't wish harmness to engulf the person. This is the common thing that she almost repeats everytime. For her even my enemy should live good. When I argue she says afterall no problem is so big that it cannot be solved and what you think bad mayn't seem evil to another person. 
      When I rewind those things I think we aren't supposed to celebrate deepavali.  Even on this day I recieve text messages saying why dont the fireworks seller sell AK47 so that we can shoot Pakistan. Why do we even consider them as our enemy. Simple when it comes to politics or protecting the nation everything becomes the realist perspective where all the humans are by nature selfish. 
          Are we not sad after shedding the  blood of Indians and Pakistanis to an extent that even the Himalayan ranges are bloodshed. See how much hatred we share on naragasuran that we kill him and we even celebrate his death just because he was evil and he told to celebrate his death. On the day of his death we create harm to a majority of the people but bursting crackers. Crackers create sound and noise pollution. 
   Another notion, Deepavali is celebrated on a no moon day and they prepare food and serve them to the crow, believing crows to be our ancestors. Today since everybody started bursting crackers early in the morning not even a single crow was there. It was like we are chasing the crow out of our place and celebrating the festival by remembering our ancestors, who come and bless us in the form of crows. Not even a single person is concerned of the environment and the safety of other living beings. The rockets they burst create fire and burn the kutcha houses in the slums. 
    after these realisations Deepavali never seems to be an festival for me and atleast for others if they still want to celebrate they can celebrate a green diwali by planting trees. 

Today's newspaper conveyed two ironically different stories the first news is about Modi's speech on triple talaq law and the another news was about, Mumbai haji ali dargah to allow entry of women.

             PM Modi has said in the UP campaign speech can't allow lives of muslim women to be ruined triple talaq. By this speech the women of hindu community understand that he is raising his voice for safeguarding the rights of women and for enforcing uniform civil code.
          Talaq is an arabic word used in the place of divorce given by the husband with the utterance of the word talaq for three times. However we need to understand why our PM has spoken about this before supporting his claim. There are so many rituals in Hinduism that are against women, Ambedkar burned the contents of Manusmriti because the contents said in the book demeans women and it consider's women only as a sex object. It emphasizes men to even treat women in such a way.One of the quotes from Manusmriti,
 It is the nature of women to seduce men in this world; which is why even the wise are cautious in the company of women.

                   My argument is that,  If our PM Modi is interested in enforcing uniform civil code then he should question hindu laws and scrutinize Hinduism as well but our PM is keen only in questioning the talaq law and the laws of islam. When the majority of the country constitues hindus he should first question the hinduism laws and talk for the rights of hindu women rather then questioning muslim laws which are alien to him. He is biased because he supports his religion and questions the other religion when both the religion has equal number of problems.  The untold meaning or the intention of our PM Modi is not safeguarding the rights of woman but to degrade the muslim community.

      If Modi scrutinizes talaq he should also have appreciated the entry to Haji Ali Mosque but the PM didn't do it. Hence this shows the intention of Modi to supress the muslim community.

RSS cadre wearing their new uniforms for the first time after the change of uniforms from trousers to pants: RSS is a very conservative organization and most importantly it is known for curbing the rights of women. They believe a girl is responsible for all the injustice done against her in the society. If a girl gets raped RSS statement will begin saying it is the mistake of the girl and it will proceed with the reason (assumption) it is because of the costume she wore on that day, without even making sure of the dress she wore or the rest of the facts. In such a case, no girl was/is tempted to see the legs of the RSS members or are seduced after seeing the legs. Their trousers are very comfortable allowing them to have big controversial narrow minded ideologies. The RSS keeps its myntra high girls should dress appropriately( they hate muslims and burqus that's a different story) but never teaches its men the necessary sex education. However worshiping the lord of kama should also not be questioned. They do worship the manmadan without understanding the need to learn about him. Sex education is a must in India be it the BJP or the direct RSS regime having sex education as a part of the curriculum is the only solution to reduce the injustice done against women. 
P.S. RSS should have future goals to implement skirts or saree as uniforn, they need to understand the level of comfortability and the problems we women undergo everyday wearing those annoying stuffs in the name of culture. Anyways they wont understand but still we women should follow what Periyar told us to wear. We should wear pants by giving a deaf ear to the RSS.

உலகில் அநியாயம் நடக்கும் ஒவ்வொரு சமயமும் அடக்க முடியாத ஆத்திரத்தினால் உங்களால் குமுறிக் கொந்தளிக்க முடிந்தால் நாம் தோழர்களே - சே
Remembering Che Guevara on his 50th death anniversary
9.10.1967

One of the major drawbacks of the makkal nala kootani or the people's welfare party(PWP) was the party's symbol. In the 2016 TN State legislative assembly the PWP was formed initially it constitued 4 parties the VCK, CPI, CPI(M) and the MDMK later DMDK and the  TMC. The formation of the first four parties gained respect from a lot of yongsters who were expecting a change. Later when Vijayakanth joined the PWD, the people termed it him a drunkyard and when the PWD alliance announced Vijayakanth to be the CM few decided not to vote for the alliance due to Vijayakanth's inefficiency. However PWD though lost the elections it shouldve atleast earned a good sum of votes because it was potrayed as the replacement or the change for the big corrupted parties the ADMK and the DMK. Atlast the PWD alliance ranked 4th and PMK receiving the 3rd place. Why was it so? The PMK only had respect in the Sountern states but it gained additional influence, the reason for this is the symbol of the party.

    One of the brilliant idea followed by the AIADMK is that all the alliances contesting in the election should stand with the same two leaves symbol. This was a very good political move because even people like Actor Karunas won seats. Not many know his party name but they know the symbol and they voted for it. Similarly many still vote for the two mango leaves symbol of the ADMK because it was brought into force by M.G.R and they still have faith restored on his rule (according to few he s still alive).       

         In PWD, there were seat sharing in this case for eg: If a person wants to vote for PWD because VCK is their favourite party and the person hasnt followed the news for a long time. He will obviously come and check the list of candidates and their parties in the list he maynt find VCK due to the seat sharing, that particular area mightbe under the DMDK and this person since he dont know about this chooses between the ADMK or the DMK. So there is this huge confusion among youngsters based on symbols. If PWD wants to establish themselves just like how they named themselves as the PWD they need to introduce an uniform symbol for all the parties that come under PWD only then they can establish themselves. The symbol they chose shouls also be relatable to the large number of population jut like how the Aam Admi had broomstick. The PWD should also market or PR their symbol. When I once met traffic ramasway he said he has filed a case in the high court  demanding the abolition of party symbols and the election to be based only on the picture of the candidate without even revealing the name of the candidate's party. He believes that this step can bring a bring difference and the CM will be represented purely based on talent and the amount of goodness he has done to the community.  #PWD #Change_Symbol #Tomakeachange